| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Duma, Nablus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Duma, Nablus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080207042016/http://www.pcbs.gov.ps:80/Portals/_pcbs/populati/pop06.aspx to http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/Portals/_pcbs/populati/pop06.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:35, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
This has been reinstated to the lead, despite it having had a death toll of three. Killings with death tolls multiple times higher happened in small towns such as Dunblane, Enniskillen, Hungerford & Omagh. However, there's no mention of the Dunblane massacre, Remembrance Day bombing, the Hungerford massacre or the Omagh bombing in the leads of those articles, despite those mass murders certainly being the things that those towns are best-known for. Jim Michael (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- The leads of those other articles should be discussed on their talk pages. For this article, the single thing that this village is most famous for right up to a few days ago is a fair choice I think. Zerotalk 13:56, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- We don't usually include attacks in the leads of articles about human settlements & I don't know of a policy guideline or ruling that we should. I don't see that this one, with a death toll of 3, should be an exception. Of course, the attack should be mentioned in the article, but the paragraph in the 1967-present section is sufficient. Jim Michael (talk) 14:18, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Has anyone been convicted for these killings? Either way, the article intro or later section needs to be amended accordingly.