Talk:Duane–Hunt law

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 150.227.15.253 in topic Inverse photoelectric effect

Reference is incorrect

edit

The reference cited "W. Duane, F.L. Hunt, Phys. Rev 6 (1915), 166" is not at all helpful as it appears to be correct. The archive of Physical Review shows that in fact Volume 6 of Physical Review has no article by Duane and Hunt.

http://prola.aps.org/toc/PR/v6/i3 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.252.66 (talk) 12:47, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

What of "On X-Ray Wave-Lengths". Physical Review. 6: 166. 1915. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.6.166. (Can't access it right now). Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 13:04, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Inverse photoelectric effect

edit

This term is used when photons (e.g. x-ray or UV) are emitted due to free electrons captured by empty states in matter, but is it really used in the context of Bremsstrahlung emission? I doubt it although Bremsstrahlung generation might be accompanied by some inverse photoemission, in particular from electrons having lost most of there energy.150.227.15.253 (talk) 13:16, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply