Talk:Drowned God/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 05:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):
   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):
   b (citations to reliable sources):
   c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects):
   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Infobox

• Information in body of article needed to support that it was released on "Windows 95" platform
• Source needed to verify ratings of "ELSPA" and "USK"

Lead

• No issues

Story

• Wiki-link "Dystopian"

Gameplay

• No issues

Development

• Move this section to the top of the article as it will make more sense on how it was developed

Reception

• If "Adventure Gamers" had no score or review, please remove it from the review scores table

References

• General note: Do not italicize sources that are not publications. Please move them to the publisher section for proper formatting. Here are some examples of this:

  Reference 1 → "MobyGames" is not a written publication and should not be italicized

  References 2-4 → "GameSpot" should not be italicized

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 19:07, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

About the development section, I'd gone back and forth on it. Normally, I've seen it below plot and gameplay sections, but I felt like it was better in front, so glad to see someone else felt the same way. I believe I have addressed all the other issues. Thanks for the review! —Torchiest ^talk_edits 19:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Nice job on responding so quickly! Since all issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Keep up the good work! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 19:57, 15 July 2012 (UTC)