Talk:Driscoll's/Archives/2012

Peacock terms

This article so far sounds like an ad, possibly even material lifted from a Driscoll's web site. The company is notable and there surely are neutral sources out there to show that they dominate the U.S. market, but the article at present cites no such sources and often seems to be the commercial version of a fansite. Lawikitejana 11:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

..Change the words you don't like then. Nothing the article says is untrue. I agree it's phrased a bit rosy but it's less biased than several articles on wikipedia that remain up despite staggering POV problems. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.109.157.193 (talk) 15:08, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

okey dokey, i made it not sound like an advertisement. as you can see in the diffs here and here and here this leaves very little material. i agree with Lawikitejana that the company is notable, and am hoping to find time to fix this article. of course, help out if you want to! — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 14:35, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

note WP:COI by article's creator here. — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 16:03, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Driscolls NAME logo.JPG

Image:Driscolls NAME logo.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:13, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Further Reading

i am creating this section in the article to list reliable sources which discuss this company, to be integrated into the article as i can assimilate them. — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 02:34, 26 August 2011 (UTC)