Talk:Doro (musician)/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Lewismaster in topic GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: JayJay (talk · contribs) 22:42, 20 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I will start the review soon. JayJayWhat did I do? 22:42, 20 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quick Comments edit

I see the article has a tag at the top claiming it has an excessive or improper use of non-free media, I see no problems though so you can remove the tag. References number 11 and 13 the websites no longer exist so that should be taken care of that. In the section Doro in Europe (1991-1999), the sentence in the first paragraph says "which contains several ballads and has a very intimate and bluesy feel" I would get rid of that because it does not have a neutral view. Also in the same section paragraph 3 starts off 'Returned in the US after the European tour,' re-word it, confusing. Also paragraph 5 in the same section starts off 'She signed a worldwide contract with the major record label WEA' replace She with Doro. Other than that there is no other issues.

Review edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Waiting for refs 11 and 13 to be fixed  Done
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    waiting for Doro in Europe (1991-1999) to be fixed  Done fixed it myself as it was only a minor issue
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I will give you 7 days to clean up the issues above  Done
Thank you for your quick and positive review. And now to the next... Lewismaster (talk) 19:58, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.