Talk:Document classification

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rushastha.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Copyright Infringement

Copyright Infringement

Most of the contents of this article is a direct copy of this scholarly article: http://www.academia.edu/1612159/Is_classification_necessary_after_Google190.140.148.104 (talk) 21:31, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

..... I think this page should be moved to Text Classification and Document Classification should redirect to Text Classification. Why? Text Classification better describes what the page is about, such classification techniques are not limited to being applied to a whole document of text, they can be applied to portions of text within a document. Also I think this page also belongs in the WikiProject Computer science. Jeff Kubina (talk) 15:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

I agree that Text Classification is the better name for this page.Johnhenrylawyer (talk) 20:54, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Classification versus clustering

SemMac (talk) 06:07, 8 November 2009 (UTC) It would be useful if the article makes the distinction between classification and clustering. Classification applies to supervised learning where a teacher gives the categories, while clustering applies to the unsupervised situation.

The title (Document classification) implies this article is about supervised learning, but the body makes it clear that it covers both supervised and unsupervised learning and the algorithms listed also cover both situations. Unfortunately I can't think of a better title. The alternative word categorization normally also implies supervised learning. For example see http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Text_categorization

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Document classification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150424122349/https://seer.lcc.ufmg.br/index.php/jidm/article/download/43/41An to https://seer.lcc.ufmg.br/index.php/jidm/article/download/43/41An
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.artsyltech.com/da_classification.htmlAutomatic

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)