Talk:Document automation/Archives/2012
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Bias
There are several forms of bias going on in this article. In particular one editor, HFMClark, who appears to be involved with the Epoq group [1] has made significant changes, including a reference to WiseGEEK, which is not a reliable source, and has including uncited, unencyclopedic OR.[2]. 98.210.208.107 (talk) 18:48, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
I thought I was very careful to back up all my revisions with citations (could you be more specific on what is un-encylopedic or uncited). Of course if WiseGeek is an unreliable source then the definition I took from there shouldn't be used but I thought it worked better than what was there originally. HFMClarke 08:36 EST, 05 April 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by HFMClarke (talk • contribs) 19:35, 5 April 2011 (UTC)