Talk:Disruptive solutions process

Full of unexplained jargon & TLAs.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Disruptive solutions process. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061020000103/http://www.seeandavoid.org/ to http://www.seeandavoid.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061020000103/http://www.seeandavoid.org/ to http://www.seeandavoid.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070630051923/http://www.afmrm.org/ to http://www.afmrm.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090227060019/http://www.lockheedmartin.com/aeronautics/skunkworks/14rules.html to http://www.lockheedmartin.com/aeronautics/skunkworks/14rules.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Major edit

I've cut out big chunks of this that were full of jargon or detail that would be uninteresting to most readers. As a result the page should now be a lot more readable. Feel free to revert a change if you think any of the content lost was truly valuable. Telemachus12389 (talk) 10:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Unfortunately, removal of the basic process removed the definition of what DSP actually is, which made the article less useful (to the point that the article might be considered for deletion) - even if it does appear that some of the original citations no longer work. I have added the basic process back in. Winged Cat (talk) 06:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)