Talk:Disaster risk reduction/Archive 1

Suggestions in 2008

edit

I would suggest that Disaster risk reduction is how we stop it happening and disaster management is what we do once it has.

I think we should merge the this with Disaster management since this topic comes under that —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.244.30 (talk) 16:47, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't agree since they are very distinct areas and require different activities, interventions and actions. In fact there is a need for more detail of how to prepare for and reduce the impact of different kinds of disaster such as floods, cyclones, earthquakes. Each require a different focus. Water and sanitation preparedness and DRR is also different from health promotion or health system preparedness for example. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckob2 (talkcontribs) 17:05, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Disaster risk reduction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Subcontext for saving 200,000 lives with clean drinking water

edit

The article reports in "Context" that $1 of less humanitarian aid, invested in prevention, yields a $5 - $10 reduction in need for aid. It also decries that only 1% of the $10 billion in aid is "invested" in prevention of losses from disaster.

MATH: The claim is that $1 invested in "risk reduction" saves "$5 to $10 in economic losses from disaster."

1% of $10 billion in humanitarian aid= $100 million.

So it's reduce humanitarian aid for drinking water by $1, to have $10 to save the dictator's palace? The $1 buys 2 cubic meters of water (NYTimes#s). Based on water pricing & usage, that's about 200,000 people of water/year. Pi314m (talk) 22:34, 6 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Map from German Watch's publication "Global Climate Risk Index"?

edit

Would like to add the map from German Watch's publication "Global Climate Risk Index" https://germanwatch.org/sites/germanwatch.org/files/20-2-01e%20Global%20Climate%20Risk%20Index%202020_10.pdf. Have requested copyright release from German Watch. ASRASR (talk) 01:19, 30 November 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASRASR (talkcontribs) 14:58, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Culled the list of "major publications"

edit

I have culled the list of "major publications" from the article. If anyone wants to cite any of these publications in the text (or put websites under external links), go ahead: