This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
‹See TfM›
|
is this article a direct copy from a book?? "[..]there will be a way to determine it self-consistently which we'll introduce later.[..]" but this is never introduced. --128.178.157.155 (talk) 16:03, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
I was just going to agree with the above. This article provides a decent, if small, amount of background on the method, but quite clearly looks to be pulled out from a larger work. Given that it wasn't cited, I'd be surprised if it was fair use. 130.49.170.136 (talk) 20:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)