Talk:Dianic tradition

Neopaganism Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles

merge edit

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I do not think it would be correct to merge this article on Dianic Tradition with Dianic Wicca; Dianic Wicca is only one branch, and possibly the minority expression, of the Tradition. I understand Wicca is essentially a dualistic religion which honors both God and Goddess. Most Dianic tradition pracitioners are monotheistic or panentheistic, and are committed to Goddess worship. To ignore this fundamental difference in belief because they are both Goddess worshipping pagans would be similiar to ignoring differences of Catholics and Protestants because they are both Christian.

Should Dianic Tradition be merged with Dianic? SC 03:07, 10 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

I think so. Some editing required also - myself being Dianic & male but not McFarland being but one example ;-)Bridesmill 01:17, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic