Talk:Destination: Imagination/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by SuperFlash101 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Theleftorium 16:29, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've done some edits to the article and it looks good (although I think the plot section is a bit too big and the reception section is a bit too small). The only thing that keeps me from passing the article is the infobox image. The fair-use rationale is really weak and I'm not sure it meets the non-free content criteria. Theleftorium 16:20, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I strengthened the rationale, it should be good now. The Flash {talk} 19:51, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    A bit small but comprehensive enough for GA.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
Congrats! Theleftorium 20:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review! :) The Flash {talk} 20:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply