Talk:Deflection (engineering)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Turbojet in topic Suggest merging this with Beam_(structure)

Formulas edit

fB = F·L3 / (3·E·I) φB = F·L2 / (2·E·I)

It would be helpful to identify "f" and "B" in this equation.

Noelstalker (talk) 14:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Noel StalkerReply

Image misleading edit

Image under topic "End Load Cantilever Beams" shows a beam in mode 6 vibration, which is quite different from the deflection of an "end-loaded" beam. 209.254.20.114 (talk) 22:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fixed. Hermanoere (talk) 23:31, 22 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Too shallow edit

This article is too shallow to be useful.

What's especially missing are proofs and also indications on whether the results are exact or approximate.

Also missing is which of the listed methods should be used under which circumstances. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.243.199.239 (talk) 09:55, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Added statements about assumptions under which the formulas were developed.Hermanoere (talk) 23:05, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Units edit

Could someone add the units to the formula ? I tried my best but can not found the SI unit for Elasticity modulus ?_? 2A01:E35:8B31:3450:B982:FF4E:558A:854F (talk) 20:19, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Added quick discussion of units.Hermanoere (talk) 23:05, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Suggest merging this with Beam_(structure) edit

An article on beams already exists. But that article only talks about types of beams and stresses, not deflection. Since this article (Deflection_(engineering)) talks about deflection only of beams, it should really be a subsection in the other article. Hermanoere (talk) 14:14, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

The subject of the article applies not only to beams. Shafts are subject to the same issues. --Turbojet (talk) 11:56, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Linear relationship Load - Deflection edit

It would be helpful to highlight there is a linear relationship between the load and deflection. --188.167.156.157 (talk) 09:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Martin MedvedReply