 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
This article should be removed due to lack of citations. It seems to be the author's opinion on the subject matter.
I concur with the comment made above about removal. However, not today, but the begining of next week I would like to do the article/subject myself as this is right now nothing more than a flimsy definition [opinion] piece. This was not authored by an expert nor a researcher, not anybody remotely close to being qualified. Wikipedia, thankfully, has beter protocol that this set up. No disrespect to the original author, seriously we are thankful for any and all attempts.
I really should not have attempted to alter something so fundamentaly flawed in the first place [as the article is still as flawed as before. No time at present to do this, again next week, will be completed. Given the opportunity [do not bother editing now, till I am finished], I will take this upon myself to follow the guidelines of a fully researched, cited & referenced body of work; I do have the credentials for perfect accuracy here-- Roman Terry (talk) 18:15, 4 April 2012 (UTC)