Talk:David Ogden Stiers/Archives/2019
Latest comment: 5 years ago by ResultingConstant in topic Does he still qualify under restrictions on coverage of the living and recently deceased?
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Does he still qualify under restrictions on coverage of the living and recently deceased?
He passed away exactly one year ago; is it now alright to put the information from my edit referenced above back on his page? User talk:Northern Hills 09:19, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- The header question and the question in the message are different. No, the BLP restriction does not still apply. But the addition would still come down to being based on a single statement he once supposedly made to a dubious blog. It's a "can" versus "should" thing. --Nat Gertler (talk) 12:34, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Especially since it is a dubious source that he explicitly and unequivocally contradicted in a more reliable source. While policy may no longer prohibit inclusion of this information, there would need to be consensus for inclusion and as of right now there is a very strong consensus against. If the OP wishes to post a new neutral RFC at this point, I think that it would be in-bounds to have the discussion again. ResultingConstant (talk) 15:21, 5 March 2019 (UTC)