Talk:Dæmonen/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Gabriel Yuji in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gabriel Yuji (talk · contribs) 16:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

The article seems good to me. Only a few issues you must address:

  • Its mentioned on lead that Dæmonen is designed by Bolliger & Mabillard, but there is no mention about it on the article's body.
Fixed.--Dom497 (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • The flow of sentece is broken by parentheses in "Following the turn, the train enters the main 65.6-foot (20.0 m) drop (reaching the roller coasters top speed of 48 miles per hour (77 km/h)) leading directly into a vertical loop."
Fixed.--Dom497 (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "Also, unlike traditional steel roller coasters, Dæmonen has no floor on its trains." needs a source
The linked article is the source. Also, if you look at RCDB (which is a reliable source) it says the coaster is a Floorless Coaster. Either way, I've put a ref.--Dom497 (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "In 2004, Dæmonen was voted the 98th best steel roller coaster in the world in Mitch Hawker's Best Steel Roller Coaster Poll. The roller coaster peaked at 65th place in 2005." lack of source
Source is in the table. No need to put a footnote at the end of the sentence IMO.--Dom497 (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Is really necessary to mention "Dæmonen has never placed in Amusement Today's Golden Ticket Awards"? I think it would only be helpful/informative for readers if it had placed on this award.

Gabriel Yuji (talk) 16:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes, because the GTA awards are the most well known amusement park awards. It is also mentioned in several other GA roller coaster articles that have not placed in the awards.--Dom497 (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

@Gabriel Yuji: I have addressed your comments. Thanks for the review!--Dom497 (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Since you have addressed the issues I pointed and I couldn't find other issues, I'll pass it. Congratulations! Gabriel Yuji (talk) 01:21, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Reply