Talk:Cultural policies of the European Union/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Cultural policies of the European Union. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Talk from Life in the European Union
Tidy and Expansion
I've heavily edited this article trying to clean it up, espically with regards to linking to other EU cultural bodies and categorising. There is a lot of expansion needed still in many sections, someone with more knowledge of the area needs to fill it in!
New article....List of non-EU cultural institutions, bodies and programmes
it was contradictory to create "NON-EU cultural institutions, bodies and programmes" section i know, but my idea was to clarify between projects directly funded/founded by the EU and other (non-eu) European cultural projects. they can be hard to distinguish with their generic names. perhaps creating and linking to a new article would be clearer and less contradictory.
Neutrality
I've made some amendments to this page, but I have better things to do than deal with all of it. It was obviously set up as a propaganda exercise to list "good" things about the EU and imply that the EU should do ever more. No attempt at neutrality has been made by the creators. The non-existence of Life in the United States, which was formerly a red link under "See also", or similar articles for nation states, exposes this as the hollow propaganda exercise it was designed as. It should have been deleted. Osomec 18:48, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
- Perhaps, but you have the opposite. I agree with the Lisbon Strategy comment though. Skinnyweed 18:35, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Mergeit
Please merge this with culture of Europe. Having an article called "life in XXX" is not befitting a serious encyclopedia. It means everything and nothing at once. - Peter Isotalo 06:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- This article is a bit unnessacary and uncylopedic, and I think it is biased in favor of the EU heavily. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Raspberrysnapple (talk • contribs) 02:52, 30 April 2007 (UTC).
- Totally agree, it is just links to other sections, we don't need this. It gives nothing, along with its template which has long since been replaced by the EU-related topics navbox. - J Logan t: 08:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)