 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
This is a reputable summary of the Cultural Consensus Model. (Finally.) There also are several peer-reviewed scientific references listed, they are identified as [#]. Susanweller (talk) 22:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Content needs qualification in places that might presently attract controversy. Will benefit from adding more internal Wikipedia links for technical vocabulary. Should a link or reference to Q-Methodology be included? --Mdfischer (talk) 08:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Added some internal links and consolidated the references. I do not think there is any controversy remaining in the article. Mdfischer (talk) 09:20, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
- Removed the "May contain original research" tag. The original author did include original research of her own, but these results have long sense become accepted by the peer community as the foundation references for this Theory/Method. For same reason, removed the "needs attention of expert" tag, as the author is one of the leading experts for this method. Mdfischer (talk) 09:20, 23 February 2011 (UTC)