Talk:Cruelty-free

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2020 and 12 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Christiang1122, Britt0903.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Redirect

I propose a redirect / merge with ethical consumerism or animal rights. 217.50.71.157 (talk) 17:28, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Oppose. There is obvious overlap with those topics but this one seems sufficiently distinct that we can make something of it. I shall improve the article to demonstrate. Warden (talk) 18:06, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Oppose I think it passes notability for long, and it should be expanded instead of emerged into something else. --14.198.220.253 (talk) 10:29, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Oppose I am in favor of expanding rather than contracting or merging the cruelty-free coverage. MaynardClark (talk) 21:22, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Support In the last ten years, this article has not significantly improved and employs language which lacks objectivity. I fail to see how it contributes anything that is not already covered in the well-written article on Testing cosmetics on animals which explains the term "cruelty free" in its third paragraph and has a section dedicated to non-profits like "Cruelty Free International." Caecilia24 (talk) 22:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Bias

Referencing a biased organisation without expressly mentioning that the organisation is biased is misleading. There is a passage which I noticed contained language I had seen in other propaganda, I checked, and it was indeed from Cruelty-Free International. "A cosmetic ingredient" is not a thorough description, and to then say that the animal is treated cruelly is subjective. The animals may have been treated cruelly, but we don't know, and if we don't know, it's best to not make such allegations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.27.157.230 (talk) 21:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Product Labels

I just want to bring up how people often think that cruelty-free and vegan labels are interchangeable. For those who are vegan, cruelty-free labels are important to look out for, but that does not mean that the product is free of animal ingredients. I think it is important to mention the difference because people who look for cruelty-free labels are often vegans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corodovia (talk • contribs) 15:28, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cruelty-free. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130331094749/http://www.crueltyfreeinternational.org/en/the-issue/animal-tests-and-alternatives to http://www.crueltyfreeinternational.org/en/the-issue/animal-tests-and-alternatives

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)