Talk:Creation Spirituality
Please see my explanations for changes made to this entry at the Talk:Matthew Fox (priest) page. Thanks. WikiSceptic 19:47, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
new religious movement?
editWhat term do we use for creation spirituality? It's not a denomination or a cult. Is it a new religious movement? A spiritual system? 67.170.55.241 18:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- I can't see a reason not to call it a theology. Can anyone? --grant (talk) 18:05, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
"multiple issues see talk page!"
editThe ordinary message when templates are added, and as usual I find nothing here, no explanation, nothing! It's very easy to complain, but seemingly it's very hard to explain what is wrong. For now I'm deleting the notability issue. In answer to the sloppy no-explanation attitude, I should not motivate myself, but still I do: googling for "Creation spirituality" "Matthew Fox" gives 14800 hits. That's much more than for Darian calendar, or for Technetium star. The notability issue timed out (3 months), and cannot be motivated. ... said: Rursus (bork²) 19:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- WP:GOOGLEHITS is not evidence of notability. The topic needs substantial coverage in reliable third party sources. As for Darian calendar & Technetium star, this is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (the former appears to be very badly sourced and should be deleted, the latter is referenced to what appears to be a scholarly source). HrafnTalkStalk 02:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
WP:V states "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found featuring significant coverage of a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." If no such sources can be found for this topic, I'll be redirecting the article. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 08:15, 18 February 2009 (UTC)