Talk:Crawl (2019 film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 18:10, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

• Hello Some Dude from North Carolina, I'll be taking up the review for this nomination and will present it to you shortly. I hope you will find my feedback to be useful. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 18:10, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

  Some Dude From North Carolina, I have completed the review and it seems to meet the good article criteria on nomination. Good work, I could not locate any issues with it except the one I have mentioned in the comments below. I'm not too concerned about it so I'll promote it to a good article but please do consider it. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 14:20, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• Earwig's copyvio detector brings up a fairly high percentage. Most of this is due to quotes and some false positives. In particular, this seems to be because of a Pepper's quote in the casting section, which I would suggest trimming down a bit and instead summarising what he says. There are some copied phrases as well which I would recommend rephrasing; e.g "months of endurance training", "open his eyes underwater for long periods of time".

Assessment

1. Comprehension: The article is well written.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	The prose is clear and concise.	Pass
(b) (MoS)	The article is compliant with the manual of style.	Pass

2. Verifiability: The article is verifiable and well researched.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	Contains all necessary inline citations and a list of references.	Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	Sources used are reliable.	Pass
(c) (original research)	No original research found.	Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	No major issues with copyright or plagiarism.	Neutral

3. Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	The article has a broad coverage of all major aspects.	Pass
(b) (focused)	The article remains on topic and without unnecessary deviations.	Pass

4. Neutrality: The article is neutral.
Pass

Notes	Result
The article is compliant with the policy of neutral point of view.	Pass

5. Stability: The article is stable.
Pass

Notes	Result
No ongoing content disputes, edit warring or major changes.	Pass

6. Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	Images used are tagged with their appropiate copyright statuses.	Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	Captions are appropiate.	Pass