Talk:Cramming (fraud)/Archives/2013
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Damian Yerrick in topic Claim of cramming by AT&T Mobility
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Overtime Claim Padding
Does the practice of adding or extending work overtime claims come under the banner of Cramming? The practice involves submitted time sheets or claim sheets for overtime worked where the work never occurred or where the work was less than the overtime being claimed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.13.3.89 (talk) 01:19, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Claim of cramming by AT&T Mobility
According to this page's own definition, AT&T is committing fraud. This would be a major legal problem.
The act of adding a smartphone data plan when one is not on the account when a SIM is inserted into a smartphone is described in AT&T's wireless terms and conditions found here, specifically, this point. I feel this should be removed. DennisM83 (talk) 06:25, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
- I was under the impression that the contract laws of the several states and federal laws regulating interstate commerce required certain terms to be made conspicuous. Are those terms made conspicuous enough when the user signs up for service through an AT&T representative? And if it's not cramming, what's the legal term for practices of the sort described under "this point"? --Damian Yerrick (talk) 05:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)