Talk:Courageous (song)/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Rp0211 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 02:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  


Infobox

edit
  • No information in article to support genre of song as "Christian rock"

Lead

edit
  • Include some information about the song from the "Background and recording" section and put it in the first paragraph of the lead

Background and recording

edit
  • No issues

Composition

edit
  • No issues

Critical reception

edit
  • Tom Lennie of Cross Rhythms was less positive, calling the song was "one of the least melodic tunes... Replace "was" with "as"
  • ...and said the bridge made the song "thought-provoking".[6] Wiki-link "the bridge" as some readers may not know what this refers to

Release and chart performance

edit
  • No issues

Credits and personnel

edit
  • No issues

Chart positions

edit
  • Put information into subsections to organize the section better

Release and radio history

edit
  • No issues

References

edit
  • Reference 7 "Salem Web Network" should not be wiki-linked, as it was mentioned before
  • Reference 10 "Gospel Music Channel.com" should be changed to "Gospel Music Channel"
  • References 13, 14 "Radio & Records" and "VNU Media" should not be wiki-linked
  • References 16-35 "Billboard" and "Prometheus Global Media" should not be wiki-linked


After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not concern good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 02:43, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Since all issues have been addressed, I feel comfortable passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 21:39, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply