 | This article was nominated for merging with Organizational memory on 28 August 2007. The result of the discussion was Merge. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from Corporate memory was copied or moved into Organizational memory with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Corporate edit
What a silly names are constructed with Corporate... Why not simpler organizational...?! I understand selling efforts... Sorry folks, but encyklopedija is not a collection of buzzwords. Definition needs more precision and clearness.--AndriuZ 09:52, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
I think if you take a step back and consider not what the word Corporate defines in the commercial sense, but rather what it defines as in the collective sense, the word becomes quite concise and descriptive. From the Free Dictionary: United or combined into one body; collective: made a corporate effort to finish the job. --Helf 21:06, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
SO should we use "corporate" or " "organizational" memory then ? cause if it were me, if i can't find corporate i'll use organizational Wisnu 1 November 2006
Propose merger with Knowledge Management edit
In accordance with Wikipedia policy (see WP:MM#Overlap), I propose that this article is merged with the article on Knowledge Management, as the similarity of the content of the article is striking, even if the titles are different. Otherwise I would be suspicious that the article had been created to promote a book, service or college course and, as such, would be worthy of deletion. -- Gavin Collins 16:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- I support the alternative, merge with Organizational memory which refers to the same concept Harvey the rabbit (talk) 02:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Merge with Organizational Memory article edit
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result was merge into Organizational memory. -- Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 21:19, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
I suggest merging with Organizational memory, which refers to the same concept and is much more frequently used in the literature - and then delete this article. On the other hand, "knowledge management" should be kept separate as it encompasses organizational memory -- josei 18:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed, suggest it be merged with Organizational memory as you are correct, it does refer to the same concept Harvey the rabbit (talk) 02:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- And Institutional memory as well. --Cat4567nip (talk) 14:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC)