Talk:Cooper's ligaments

I don't think flippancy is probably a good style for Wikipedia, women are very sensitive on this issue, which anyway is very controversial. Mgoodyear 15:22, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Requires significant additional sources. There are lots of assertions here but nothing to back any of them up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.250.153.211 (talk) 03:48, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Controversy in Anatomy and Cultural References

The claim in the cultural references (implying that ligaments are not responsibile for breast shape) is directly opposite to that in the anatomy section (they are).

Elimination of the cultural reference section would be suggested as anatomically they seem to be doing the latter. Will attempt to verify with a book-source before elimination in a few weeks, barring no discussion.

129.125.146.35 (talk) 14:43, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Pictures?

Even an schematic drawing would already help... --TiagoTiago (talk) 01:24, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cooper's ligaments. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080917025215/http://www.ivillage.co.uk/beauty/promotions/articles/0%2C%2C628687_694143%2C00.html to http://www.ivillage.co.uk/beauty/promotions/articles/0%2C%2C628687_694143%2C00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 12 August 2017 (UTC)