Talk:Conwy town walls/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Hchc2009 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk contribs count) 18:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteriaReply


Nicely done.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    A picture of the upper gate with the remains of its barbican would be useful if one can be found.
I can't find one unfortunately; I agree it would be good. Ironically I was there a few months ago, but didn't know about the barbican at the time! Next time though, I'll make sure I get a decent photo of it.Hchc2009 (talk) 17:13, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
  1. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: