Talk:Contra III: The Alien Wars/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by TarkusAB in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 22:12, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Great article, only concern is that the Nintendo Life article is written by a user and not an editor. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 22:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Info and source removed TarkusABtalk/contrib 23:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Also to note, User:Abryn/Game reception has some sources relating to the three Contra III versions, so it might be worthwhile checking there to see if there's anything you missed. Will pass either way once issue is dealt with. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 22:42, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Reply