Talk:Continuous Tone-Coded Squelch System

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Audibility edit

Perhaps put

In a professional communications receiver designed for CTCSS, a high-pass audio filter is supposed to block CTCSS tones (below 300 Hz) so they are not heard in the speaker.

into a new sub sub section called Audibility. Because lots of us indeed hear them. Jidanni 00:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

PMR 446 edit

I just reverted an unreferenced edit that asserted that PMR 446 had a standardized set of identifiers for the squelch tones. While quite a few radios do use a sequential series of numbers for the squelch tones supported by that radio, I've not seen anything that indicates that there is any standard identifiers than the Motorola PL codes. I'd be happy to help add that to the table if it can be referenced as something more than one manufacturer's set of numbers.

Also the person tried being helpful by evening out the three tables, but they are three separate tables on purpose, Each table contains codes from a different harmonic sequence. Caerwine Caer’s whines 16:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I came to this article looking for the 1-38 non-standardized numerical squelch codes, and found what i needed in citation #2. Actually all the information is given on which codes to exclude from the numerical line-up in the article. You are forced then to assign numbers manually based on this info, which is silly. It would be nice in my opinion if they were in the table as long as the column header was labeled something appropriate given their haphazard industry adoption. What would be an appropriate header? How about 'non-standard numerical'? You are right when you say quite a few manufacturers use the same set. While not an official standard, it is still encyclopaedic i think. ExtremeSquared (talk) 15:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Continuous Tone-Coded Squelch System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 30 June 2017 (UTC)Reply