Talk:Constitutional Accountability Center

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sarahrathje. Peer reviewers: Mcmillenjudge, Weigers.g.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Peer Feedback

edit

Sarahrathje great article Sarahrathje! I added a link to Textualism. Your article follows the perfect article template well! Notably, it's not a "dead-end" article as it promotes more addition over time and has ample links to other sources. Good work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weigers.g (talkcontribs) 15:23, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

The "ligitation" section

edit

This section has had the {{unsourced section}} template on it since October 2019. It could be that no one has found citations relating to the fact that this organization filed those lawsuits, because there were no citations about that in RSes. If that is the case, the problem there is that the judgment would be that the world of RSes doesn't think that it is very important that this group filed those amicus briefs. If the New York Times, etc., thought it was significant enough for this group to have done that, they would have mentioned that. One might then infer that the usual newspapers that would write about constitutional litigation just don't think that this group's activities in this regard are worthy of mentioning. If that turns out to be the case, then this section probably doesn't belong here, because its activities in this regard are not sufficiently RS-notable. (It would just seem like advertising, really, in that case. Novellasyes (talk) 17:10, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply