Talk:Connie Smith/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mr. R00t ^Talk 00:19, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

GA Criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality: The prose is a tad bit long. Otherwise good.

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources: - Sorry for the delay.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Very good.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: In the musical career section there really need to be more images. Only three images in the article.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Found another image on Flickr. Mr. R00t ^Talk 00:51, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

• Re: images, if three's all we have then that's all we can use, because they do have to be free ones. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:47, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

I do know that. I'm going to look around for free images of her. Mr. R00t ^Talk 17:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Outcome

I've added this to the GA list. I've added the template. It is now a Good Article. Mr. R00t ^Talk 01:04, 6 November 2010 (UTC)