Talk:Connie Smith/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by 1234r00t in topic Outcome

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mr. R00t Talk 00:19, 31 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA Criteria

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:   The prose is a tad bit long. Otherwise good.
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  - Sorry for the delay.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:   Very good.
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:   In the musical career section there really need to be more images. Only three images in the article.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:   Found another image on Flickr. Mr. R00t Talk 00:51, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
I do know that. I'm going to look around for free images of her. Mr. R00t Talk 17:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Outcome

edit

I've added this to the GA list. I've added the template. It is now a Good Article. Mr. R00t Talk 01:04, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply