Talk:Congressional Page sex scandal

Making this a disambig page

This article WAS the article on the 1983 Congressional page sex scandal until it was moved a few days ago. It stands to reason that people visiting this would be looking for that page. In fact, a number of links for the 1983 scandal still point to this namespace. It also stands to reason that people would not be looking for the Mark Foley scandal, which can not fairly be characterized as a sex scandal. I think there is no reason to make this a disambugation page and it should remain a redirect to its original article.--Bibliophylax 15:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

I completely disagree. There should be a disambig page. Comic J 22:30, 8 October 2006 (UTC)