Discussion header edit

Some thoughts edit

Overall not a bad article at all. A very good start. There are couple areas that I would hone in on.

  1. Look for some reliable sources outside of the wineries own web pages. This will also help with the POV side as well because you are more likely to get some more objective third party views from an outside third party source.
  2. Establish in the lead what distinctly makes this winery notable. (Largest producer in Chile? First winery to do some particular thing, etc)


As for other thoughts, I really like the vineyard section. They provide excellent descriptions-especially since the winery's holding transverse several Chilean appellations. I also think you did an excellent job in going into the wine making technique. Again, overall I think this is a very good start for the article. AgneCheese/Wine 04:13, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Primary source edit

Re: "the official site is the most reliable source for this kind of article. Please be more specific about any facts that need further verification"

The official site is a primary source. This article needs sources or references that appear in credible, third-party publications. Alone, primary sources and sources affiliated with the subject of the article are not sufficient for an accurate encyclopedia article. Please include more appropriate citations from reliable sources. --Geniac 15:00, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree with you, I sincerely don't believe Casillero del Diablo devil's story, the reference is taken from the official site though, therefore more sources are necessary for some topics.--Andersmusician VOTE 02:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wineyards in Argentina edit

I have deleted the sentence that C y T has only Wineyards in Chile, as I know for sure it manages it's subsidiary "Trivento" in Mendoza, Argentina. I think there are more posessions in Argentina, but I don't know them exactly, maybe somebody who knows could add an Argentine Section. Thanks --194.203.215.254 (talk) 15:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio edit

I'm more than a little disturbed at entire paragraphs being copied from the official site. 76.22.102.229 (talk) 23:50, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Digital MedievalistReply

Then, please, indicate exactly which paragraphs you refer to so they can be removed. WP:COPYVIO is dealt with instantly. MURGH talk 07:39, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Concha y Toro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:45, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply