Talk:Computer Bismarck/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am beginning a GA review of this article. Please feel free to leave any questions, comments and other reviews below. Thanks a bunch! -- Nomader ^(Talk) 04:13, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• I'm always wary of passing something just off the bat, but you've done a very good job with this article– I can find no reason not to pass it. The images need alt text, but it's not a requirement for the article to have it at this stage. I can't check the written sources either, but I'm assuming good faith with the understanding that they accurately reflect what's sourced in the article. Congrats, Guyinblack. -- Nomader ^(Talk) 07:01, 13 August 2009 (UTC)