 | The contents of the Comparison of datasets in machine learning page were merged into list of datasets for machine learning research on 20:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC). For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
This article should be merged with the much larger and more detailed article List of datasets for machine learning research. Any dissent? --Datakeeper (talk) 18:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
For merge Absolutely. I looked for a similar list of datasets for machine learning but didn't find any. This comparison includes some extra fields though, perhaps we could add them to the corresponding table in the other article. —Kri (talk) 13:45, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Kri
That sounds great. We should go for a uniform schema if possible. When I started adding a bunch of datasets to List of datasets for machine learning research, I realized that some of the columns I originally had are really hard to figure out for most items, so I left them out. Things like Size and Number of Features (annotations). The license might also be difficult to figure out for a bunch of them. What do you think we should bring over, if anything?
- Hm, perhaps some columns are hard to figure out. I think a link to the website would be useful, and perhaps also whether it's freely available or if you have to pay for it. —Kri (talk) 22:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Resolved @Kri:, Looks like it's just us. I'll execute the merge for this article sometime this week.
- Hm, perhaps some columns are hard to figure out. I think a link to the website would be useful, and perhaps also whether it's freely available or if you have to pay for it. —Kri (talk) 22:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Kri
