Talk:Community benefits agreement
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Article issues
editThis article has several issues, as tagged. I've tried very hard to find more cites and to soften the "rah-rah" tone. Bearian (talk) 19:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Some substantial edits
editI went through, added inline citations, proofed the copy for grammar/spelling, tried to make the flow of the article more logical, and tried to make it more neutral and less "rah-rah." I also added various info where needed. However, much still needs to be done, including a better discussion of the purposes (maybe "goals" is better?) including the benefits to local governments; more discussion of the legal problems related to CBAs; and inclusion of examples of actual CBAs within the text.Cootietwo (talk) 20:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Community Benefits Agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120328052745/http://vancouver.ca/olympicvillage/PDF/CBAFactsheet.pdf to http://vancouver.ca/olympicvillage/pdf/CBAFactsheet.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Community Benefits Agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050316205956/http://www.vancouveragreement.ca/TheAgreement.htm to http://www.vancouveragreement.ca/TheAgreement.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111117040117/http://www.scopela.org/section.php?id=39 to http://www.scopela.org/section.php?id=39
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121219161053/http://hdcg.org/HillCBA to http://www.hdcg.org/HillCBA
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:36, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Templates changed
editI just swapped out the peacock template for a Refimprove. It seems to me that previous editors have removed the peacocks successfully. However, in reading the article, I did find several assertions that were completely without citation. If my removal of the peacock template doesn't make sense, please point out the inflated language that remains, and I'll make an attempt to fix it promptly. Thanks!