Talk:Comeback (Glee)/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Frickative in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) – talk 05:50, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Nice job... all greenies! Rcej (Robert) – talk 08:03, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for reviewing, Robert! And for the copy-edits, of course. I really thought I'd got a handle on the noun+ing issue, so I'm a bit sheepish there were so many left to be excised. File:Blush.png Frickative 13:17, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Results of review
editThe article Comeback (Glee) passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Pass
- Pass/Fail: Pass