Talk:Cocamide DEA

Latest comment: 10 years ago by 50.156.9.68 in topic Misleading Info

This article gives the impression that two august bodies have evaluated data to conclude that it is carcinogenic. This is not the case: Incorporation in Proposition 65 list is automatic following the classification by IARC as a carcinogen. 79.141.9.60 (talk) 14:35, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Misleading Info

edit

Anyone who takes the time to check the source given for "safety concerns" in this article will see that Cocamide DEA is listed as a possible carcinogen in California Proposition 65, a list of WATER SAFETY concerns. In other words, they're saying that it's dangerous IF YOU DRINK IT. There's nothing in that proposition about using it topically, or about shampoo. That needs to be clarified; otherwise, it's fear mongering. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.156.9.68 (talk) 20:39, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

The item safety.....

edit

See http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&q=allintitle%3A+Cocamide+DEA&btnG=Search --222.64.27.166 (talk) 06:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Could anyone who can access to the following info....

edit

please add CAS number and synonyms to the article

http://books.google.com/books?id=hKjcAAAACAAJ&dq=International+Cosmetic+Ingredient+Dictionary&source=gbs_book_other_versions_r&cad=4 --222.67.204.248 (talk) 02:10, 20 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

http://www.personalcarecouncil.org/Content/NavigationMenu/About_Us/History/History_3.htm --222.67.204.248 (talk) 02:11, 20 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

http://www.amazon.com/International-Cosmetic-Ingredient-Dictionary-Handbook/dp/1882621360 --222.67.204.248 (talk) 02:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)Reply