Talk:Clare Stevenson/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

• Prose is excellent, 9/10.

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

• "Although keen to serve the war effort in some capacity, she demurred due to the administrative and social obstacles she foresaw." - which were?

• Heh, took a bit of digging just to get that, as my first sources simply said she didn't want to do it initially, without any further explanation - but will add more if I find it. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 21:16, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail:

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 15:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for that. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 21:16, 16 January 2009 (UTC)