Talk:Chloe Mitchell/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: BrickHouse337 (talk · contribs) 19:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Review

• If you're going to list the previous child actors in the "portrayed by" parameter, then a caption is needed for the image. "Elizabeth Hendrickson as Chloe Fisher".
• "After brief marriages to Cane and then Billy, Chloe begins an unsuccessful streak of relationships with men including: Chance Chancellor (John Driscoll), Ronan Malloy (Jeff Branson), and most recently Kevin Fisher (Greg Rikaart)." Remove the ":", no need.
• I believe the correct linking for John Driscoll is John Driscoll (actor). Fix all the links to that name.
• TV Guide's Nelson Branco --> Nelson Branco of TV Guide
• "Katherine Tina Valentine was introduced by then-executive producer" --> former executive producer
• Unlink Elizabeth Hendrickson in the casting section.
• Put "Y&R" and "AMC" in italics (in the quote in the casting section).
• "Hendrickson was pleased that the writers decided to give Chloe a backstory," add something like "saying:" to the end of that.
• "Hendrickson compared their relationship, which ensued as a result of Chloe practically "threatening him", to the psychological thriller film Fatal Attraction (1987)" --> "to the 1987 psychological thriller film Fatal Attraction".
• "Billy Abbott (Billy Millor)" --> I'm assuming "Millor" was a typo? It's spelt "Miller".
• "However, the marriage and romance was prematurely ended to pave the way for the reunion between Billy and his highschool sweetheart Mac Browning (Clementine Ford)". Change "highschool" to "high school".
• "and mob princess Angelina Veneziano's (Diana DeGarmo) intense crush on Kevin (Which leads to a brief marriage, with Angelina's mob father threatening to kill Kevin if he doesn't wed his daughter)" --> "Which" should be with a lower case w.
• Remove redundancy of "A writer from Zap2it" in reception. Just say "They wrote,".
• Considering how the "in popular culture" section consists of just one fact, I would suggest merging it into reception somehow.
• Overall, these concerns need to be addressed before the review can go any further. Once they have been, I will return to pass/fail the article. Cheers, --Brick House 337 19:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

 Fixed everything so far. Thankyou for taking on the review! — Arre 03:54, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Final GA review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Fairly well covered as far as focus.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Overall, the article is in good article condition. I don't see any further issues that need to be addressed. Pass. --Brick House 337 04:03, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Thankyou so much Brick House, for the review, and for making it so fast as usual. Much love!— Arre 04:11, 23 August 2013 (UTC)