Talk:Chitinase

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Boghog in topic Speculative ref

Amazing Discoveries

edit

The items conatained about this subject is highly recommended to teach in our public and private schools for informational purposes only. T. Riley EHS. 3/4/2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by EHS4950 (talkcontribs) 17:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speculative ref

edit

@Boghog: deleted a reference and inserted the following speculative references instead:

Rosenberg MJ, Feldblum PJ, Marshall EG (Jul 1987). "Occupational influences on reproduction: a review of recent literature". Journal of Occupational Medicine. 29 (7): 584–91. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.106559. PMID 3612335.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)

If it is to be included in the article an url is needed at the minimum. Is this some sophisticated vandalism? RhinoMind (talk) 11:45, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that. The problem was before my edit, the PMC id was miss-assigned as the PMID. The script I was using to standardize the citations assumes that the value of the PMID is correct. I have included the correct PMID in this edit. Also please note that if |pmc= is assigned, it automatically links the article title to PMC, so that the |url= becomes redundant. Boghog (talk) 13:05, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Ah, that should explain a few things. But it is a completely different article, with another title? And it might even be relevant, eventhough it is from the 1980s. I haven't read it though and are not aware if it holds any useful information to add. RhinoMind (talk) 13:15, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Yes, the two articles are completely unrelated and as far as I can tell, PMID 3612335 has zero relevance to the subject of chitinase. My original edit was in error. Again, sorry about that. Boghog (talk) 14:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply