Talk:Chester station (Toronto)/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Dom497 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 22:11, 1 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    See comment section below. Good.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    See comment section below. Good.
    C. No original research:  
    See comment section below. Good.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 00:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Comments

edit
  • "In keeping with the subway line's theme the trim tiles compliment Lansdowne station while the main tiles compliment Dufferin station", rather then just saying that the tiles used are similar to Lansdowne and Dufferin station, include the actually tile colours/design. The sentence can be something like this: "In keeping with the subway line's theme, the trim tiles are blue in compliment to Lansdowne station." The reason why I left the Dufferin part out is because according to the reference provided, Dufferin and Chester have to different main colour tiles. What what it looks like, Woodbine has the same main tile colour as Chester.

The the article will be on hold for 7 days to allow the suggestions above to be addressed.--Dom497 (talk) 22:29, 1 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have passed the article.--Dom497 (talk) 00:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)Reply