Talk:Charter for Compassion

Latest comment: 4 months ago by ImperialSaponification in topic POV

Notable? or a Candidate for Deletion? edit

This appears to be a vanity project for Ms Armstrong and has made no impact at all on the real world. Why is the article even here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.225.21.78 (talk) 06:39, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

true Akp8 (talk) 10:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Charter and creative commons license edit

I have emailed the org. to see if they have released the charter under a creative commons license. It makes sense they would do so, but until i can get evidence for that, we should not reprint more than small sections of the charter here.(mercurywoodrose)50.193.19.66 (talk) 16:48, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

This is clearly a promotional piece for the organization, not an objective article. RavenVert (talk) 00:14, 9 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

POV edit

This article seems to be written like an advertisement for this organization. It is clearly not from a neutral POV. In my opinion, it needs to be either completely rewritten with an entirely different tone (and fewer hyperlinks to this thing's own website) or deleted (I don't know if it's even notable enough to have its own article). ImperialSaponification (talk) 03:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply