Talk:Charles Domery/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bencherlite^Talk 19:21, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

An excellent, bizarre article. I dread to think of the BLP problems should a person with similar eating habits come to public attention now. Fortunately, BLP isn't an issue here...

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   No images, but unlikely to be any of him, and other images unnecessary

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   No problems here. I also note that a more experienced GA reviewer has also read the text and found only one minor quibble, which was quickly sorted, and a couple of points I made on the author's talk page were also quickly fixed. Excellent work. Bencherlite^Talk 19:28, 16 June 2010 (UTC)