Talk:Chalke/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Cplakidas in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 22:23, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 22:23, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Overall summary

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A short, but comprehensive and well-written, article on an Byzantine topic.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    Well-referenced.
    B. Focused:  
    Well-referenced.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    Well-referenced.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Well-referenced.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Congratulations on the quality of the article, I'm awarding GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 22:51, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a lot! Cheers, Constantine 00:14, 27 October 2009 (UTC)Reply