Talk:Cesc Fàbregas/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Chensiyuan in topic GA Reassessment

GA Reassessment

edit

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. Please ensure that all future developments to this article are properly sourced and formatted. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 19:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
I gave the article a minor copyedit, but the prose could use a further polish. It is however not bad at all and certainly GA standard.--Jackyd101 (talk) 19:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation):   b (all significant views):  
  • It is stable.
     
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):   c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:  
    • So how was anyone supposed to know that a re-assessment was going to take place? This seemed out of the blue. Chensiyuan (talk) 03:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
      • Okay this has actually been clarified so no longer a live issue... Chensiyuan (talk) 06:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply