Talk:Celebration (party)

Latest comment: 17 years ago by 24.126.199.129 in topic Merge

Maybe this should be made a disambiguation page. Why is it that articles on some topics are written by people who know only the most commonplace colloquial meaning of a word? If I say that the Parthenon is the most celebrated buidling in Athens, or that Einstein was a celebrated physicist, or that the Archbishop of Canterbury celebrates certain rites, I'm not writing about a party. Michael Hardy 19:02, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I agree (with the disambiguation or top-level + detail) page. Pavel Vozenilek 14:40, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This is a very low activity edit page - and the quality of the text is really off! Suggestion is that Celebration (party) remain for the personal level, and a new Celebration with a qualifying parenthesis word such as group or national be used. Will do it anyway User:SatuSuro 07:17, 15 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Merge edit

Support. Celebration (party) should be merged to party then deleted. Everything that could or should be covered in celebration is and will be covered in party. 24.126.199.129 02:44, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Reply