Talk:Carleton Ravens football

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Carleton Ravens football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:32, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

File nominated for deletion on commons edit

file:c:File:Carleton Ravens logo.svg Reason:File's licensing was discussed at COM:VP/C#File:Carleton Ravens logo.svg to seek clarification, and it does not appear that this is a simple enough logo for [Template:M used with invalid code 'tl'. See documentation.]PD-textlogo based upon COM:TOO#Canada. [Template:M used with invalid code 'u'. See documentation.]Rhododendrites argument in the aforementioned discussion that this is above Canada's TOO is pretty convincing and I'm inclined to agree. The text for sure would be considered PD in my opinion, but the raven imagery does seem complex enough to be eligible for copyright. I guess the image could be split with the wordmark like part being PD-textlogo and the raven imagery being non-free content, but I don't think Commons should keep the combination of the two together per COM:PCP subpage:link 

Message automatically deposited by a robot on 09:10, 2 January 2018 (UTC).