Talk:Capite censi
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Tnlaw415 in topic verification for citation needed
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Capite censi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Verifiable source edit
Is this an English term if so pease add a source to a verifiable source if it is not an English term then it should be made clear in the article, see List of legal Latin terms for examples --Philip Baird Shearer 10:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's not a legal term as such, in the same way "welfare recipients" is not a legal term in English. Obtaining a verifiable source should not be too difficult. The term is recorded in various older encyclopaedias for instance. I'll add an example citation to article. Donama (talk) 22:38, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
verification for citation needed edit
The lack of a permanent demobilization process run by the government in Marius' military reform would help facilitate the demise of the Roman Republic.[citation needed]
Plutarch. "Fall of the Roman Republic." Translated with Introduction and Notes by Rex Warner, Revised with translations of Comparisons and a Preface by Robin Seager, with Series Preface by Christopher Pelling. Penguin Classics, 2005. page 4. ISBN 0-140-44934-5 Tnlaw415 (talk) 03:02, 25 June 2011 (UTC) Logan Williams, June 24th, 2011