Talk:Capital punishment/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by The New Mikemoral in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    Make the list prose, however, these are still okay, but I will say no.
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    Requires more citations in sections "History" and "Movements towards humane execution."
    C. No original research:  
    Questionable in the "Global distribution" to name one.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    Definitely one the better parts of this article.
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Broad range of views.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    Seems to have a history of vandalism...
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    I would recommend adding an image in the lead section.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    I recommend fixing what I said needs to be fixed. This is making more prose and more references please. Obviously, the stable-ness of article can't be change because it is about such a controversial topic. --The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 23:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply