Talk:Campaign for an Independent Britain

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 October 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

European Union (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Just removed the link to the Leicester Mercury “NATO are not peacekeepers” for the sake of neutrality as it appears to be an opinion piece in that newspaper.

I wonder now if the top box relating to neutrality should now be removed.

Also, the last two edits were made by volunteer editors.

Does anybody else have objections to this box being removed? Iza MK (talk) 13:00, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Most of the article does not comply with Wikipedia's content policies, specifically Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Verifiability. When this is resolved the templates can be safely removed. In my opinion the best way to do this is to stubify it. The article can then be expanded from reliable sources. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 22:41, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
That's very helpful. Thank you. I'll try that. Iza MK (talk) 07:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic